The entire EMF frequency range is hazardous to living cells - from infrared to nuclear radiation. We use nuclear radiation to treat diseases because it destroys cancer cells. X-Rays are dangerous but are the staple of diagnostic medicine. The sun’s UV-C radiation damages our skin cells but it is also used to disinfect hospital rooms. Infrared can burn our skin but we use it to heat our houses. I can go on, and on - microwave oven, radio and television transmitters and receivers, and let’s not forget cellular telephones (2G, 3G, 4G, 5G, and 6G). Electric motors, automobile ignitions, baby monitors, electronic kids toys.
The differences between ‘good’ and ‘evil’ are Intensity, Time and Distance. Too much, too long, and too close is bad, so we make a deal with the devil. We know there is danger, but we embrace the benefits. (Don’t get me started on cigarettes and alcohol.)
With cellular, the phones are far more dangerous than towers. The standards for acceptable radiation levels have caveats as to where and how far away they are placed from a body and how long they are used. The standards are on the edge of acceptability. (Service providers encourage hands-free for a reason.) More importantly, a cell phone typically has two power levels - 0.6 watts and 3 watts. Be far away from a cell tower and you got 3 watts rattling around inside your skull. (A truckers CB transmitter is putting out 4 watts.) It’s counterintuitive but to make cellphones and cell towers safer, you simply build more towers.
As to our bees, I’m not saying Any-G is absolutely safe. I did find one research study reporting bees being damaged by cellular radiation. Of course their determination was made by bolting two cell phones inside test beehives. I’ve seen better designed studies in high school science fairs. So to be fair, let’s say it’s inconclusive , but it’s also a distraction from the real challenges bees are facing. They are not proxies for us. One in umpteen-billion bees may pass by a cell tower, they are not their problem.