Nice graphic, did you gin it up yourself?I stand behind my "absolute agreement" statement, as that is an accurate description of the status in the field.
Its is also an easily provable statement, and has been proven time-and-time again. The consensus within climatology papers is absolute - 100% of papers which discuss the source of current climate warming identify the primary factor as anthropogenic (human) causes. When climatologists are surveyed, the consensus is 97%-100% agreement, depending on exactly what question is asked. A breif-ish summary can be found here.
Denialist organisations spend a lot of money and time trying to spread dis-information on the extent of agreement among scientists with regards to their certainty regarding the cause of global warming. Sadly, their disinformation seems to have made it too you.
I note that your curve has an asymptotic approach to 100% 'agreement'
Which means that no matter how many 'experts' you get on board, you will never reach 100%
Which blows your original premise ("absolute agreement") out of the water.
As they say.'Nice try but no cigar'.